Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Hum Resour Health ; 20(1): 40, 2022 05 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35549712

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa revealed weaknesses in the health systems of the three most heavily affected countries, including a shortage of public health professionals at the local level trained in surveillance and outbreak investigation. In response, the Frontline Field Epidemiology Training Program (FETP) was created by CDC in 2015 as a 3-month, accelerated training program in field epidemiology that specifically targets the district level. In Guinea, the first two FETP-Frontline cohorts were held from January to May, and from June to September 2017. Here, we report the results of a cross-sectional evaluation of these first two cohorts of FETP-Frontline in Guinea. METHODS: The evaluation was conducted in April 2018 and consisted of interviews with graduates, their supervisors, and directors of nearby health facilities, as well as direct observation of data reports and surveillance tools at health facilities. Interviews and site visits were conducted using standardized questionnaires and checklists. Qualitative data were coded under common themes and analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: The evaluation revealed a significant perception of improvement in all assessed skills by the graduates, as well as high levels of self-reported involvement in key activities related to data collection, analysis, and reporting. Supervisors highlighted improvements to systematic and quality case and summary reporting as key benefits of the FETP-Frontline program. At the health facility level, staff reported the training had resulted in improvements to information sharing and case notifications. Reported barriers included lack of transportation, available support personnel, and other resources. Graduates and supervisors both emphasized the importance of continued and additional training to solidify and retain skills. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation demonstrated a strongly positive perceived benefit of the FETP-Frontline training on the professional activities of graduates as well as the overall surveillance system. However, efforts are needed to ensure greater gender equity and to recruit more junior trainee candidates for future cohorts. Moreover, although improvements to the surveillance system were observed concurrent with the completion of the two cohorts, the evaluation was not designed to directly measure impact on surveillance or response functions. Combined with the rapid implementation of FETP-Frontline around the world, this suggests an opportunity to develop standardized evaluation toolkits, which could incorporate metrics that would directly assess the impact of equitable field epidemiology workforce development on countries' abilities to prevent, detect, and respond to public health threats.


Asunto(s)
Epidemiología , Salud Pública , Estudios Transversales , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Epidemiología/educación , Guinea , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Salud Pública/educación , Recursos Humanos
2.
PLoS One ; 15(6): e0234796, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32584846

RESUMEN

The 2014-2016 Ebola virus disease outbreak revealed the fragility of the Guinean public health infrastructure. As a result, the Guinean Ministry of Health is collaborating with international partners to improve compliance with the International Health Regulations and work toward the Global Health Security Agenda goals, including enhanced case- and community-based disease surveillance. We assessed the case-based disease surveillance system during October 1, 2015-March 31, 2016, in the Boffa prefecture of Guinea. We conducted onsite interviews with public health staff at the peripheral (health center), middle (prefectural), and central (Ministry of Health) levels of the public health system to document leadership structure; methods for maintaining case registers and submitting weekly case reports; disease surveillance feedback; data analysis; and baseline surveillance information on four epidemic-prone diseases (cholera, meningococcal meningitis, measles, and yellow fever). The surveillance system was simple and paper-based at health centers and computer spreadsheet-based at the prefectural and central levels. Surveillance feedback to stakeholders at all levels was infrequent. Data analysis activities were minimal at the peripheral levels and progressively more robust at the prefectural and central levels. Reviewing the surveillance reports from Boffa during the study period, we observed zero reported cases of the four epidemic-prone diseases in the weekly reporting from the peripheral to the central level. Similarly, the national District Health Information System 2 had no reported cases of the four diseases in Boffa but did indicate reported cases among all four neighboring prefectures. Based on the assessment findings, which suggest low sensitivity of the case-based disease surveillance system in Boffa, we recommend additional training and support to improve surveillance data quality and enhance Guinean public health workforce capacity to use these data.


Asunto(s)
Exactitud de los Datos , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Salud Pública/educación , Planificación en Salud Comunitaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Brotes de Enfermedades/estadística & datos numéricos , Guinea , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/epidemiología , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación
3.
Health Secur ; 18(S1): S34-S42, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004131

RESUMEN

In response to the 2014-2016 West Africa Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak, a US congressional appropriation provided funds to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to support global health security capacity building in 17 partner countries, including Guinea. The 2014 funding enabled CDC to provide more than 300 deployments of personnel to Guinea during the Ebola response, establish a country office, and fund 11 implementing partners through cooperative agreements to support global health security engagement efforts in 4 core technical areas: workforce development, surveillance systems, laboratory systems, and emergency management. This article reflects on almost 4 years of collaboration between CDC and its implementing partners in Guinea during the Ebola outbreak response and the recovery period. We highlight examples of collaborative synergies between cooperative agreement partners and local Guinean partners and discuss the impact of these collaborations in strengthening the above 4 core capacities. Finally, we identify the key elements of the successful collaborations, including communication and information sharing as a core cooperative agreement activity, a flexible funding mechanism, and willingness to adapt to local needs. We hope these observations can serve as guidance for future endeavors seeking to establish strong and effective partnerships between government and nongovernment organizations providing technical and operational assistance.


Asunto(s)
Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Cooperación Internacional , Administración en Salud Pública/métodos , Creación de Capacidad , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Salud Global , Guinea/epidemiología , Fuerza Laboral en Salud , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/prevención & control , Humanos , Administración en Salud Pública/economía , Estados Unidos
4.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 56(8): 768-74, 2003 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12954469

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We describe the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) blood pressure (BP) observer training and protocol standardization and evaluate the quality of BP measurement. METHODS: The participants were persons aged 8 years and older who had their BP measured (n=7467) during NHANES 1999-2000. Cuff width/arm circumference ratio (CW/AC), end digit preference, and observer agreement were examined. RESULTS: In stepwise principal components multiple regression analysis, CW/AC accounted for less than 2% of variability R(2) in all readings. The frequencies for all end digits were close to 20% ("0" end digit=21% systolic and 23% diastolic). No overall observer effect was present for mean systolic BP readings. A significant observer effect (P<.0001) was detected for mean diastolic BP readings of <90 mm Hg. For readings of > or =90 mm Hg, there was no significant observer effect (P=.157). CONCLUSION: We conclude that NHANES BP measurements do not demonstrate the variability that is commonly caused by observer and technical error.


Asunto(s)
Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/normas , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sesgo , Determinación de la Presión Sanguínea/instrumentación , Niño , Protocolos Clínicos , Diástole , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Institucionalización , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Sístole
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...